Articles By admin

A piece of advice for digging for the wonderful dating sites

Download PDF

It is self-understood that the Internet dating sites are widespread in these modern days. What are the reasons for it? For real, it is effortful to call all the capabilities of dating websites for the reason that there are large numbers of them. On top of that, it is of paramount importance to know how to give accent to the ideal international dating sites because if to take into consideration the wide choice of date sites it is inextricable to meet a proper solution. In such a way, we came to a decision to help you and describe the strengths of mail order bride and to tell you how to give preference to the beyond reproach dating services.

The opinions about broad-ranging dating sites for singles

Many users claim that the mail order bride has numerous advantages. It has improved the lives of broad-ranging people. Users also like that generally, they are simple. Accordingly, you will not need any special pieces of training for having a deal with the Internet dating sites.

Their merit is that you should not pay excessively for it. You do not buy candies and do not go to the cinemas. On the other end of the spectrum, usually, the dating services are not free but mostly, they are moderate.

Differing people say that thanks to the dating sites for singles they have the unique opportunity to save much time. And it is hard to argue with it by virtue of the fact that the international dating sites really save your time: you single out the person and communicate with him.

If to remember about comments of utilizers about broad-ranging dating sites, you will see that basically, they are positive.

In what way to single out the unbeatable international dating sites

Pay respect to the fact that the international dating sites should not be valuable. The most expensive dating services are not always the right ones. On the other end of the spectrum, it is highly recommended not to choose the cheapest interracial dating sites by virtue of the fact that they will not guarantee that you will have no problems.

It is a good idea to choose the date sites where you see differing profiles. This will mean that it is widely spread and has vast pros. In such a way, do not give prominence to not favorable taking into consideration the fact that you will have fewer chances to meet a partner. mail order brides, russian brides – yourbride

You have to pick the marriage dating sites which check the profiles of people before their registration. It is self-evident that they cannot check everybody perfectly, but still, they should take at least some safety features.

In spite of the fact that right now there are differing Internet dating sites, it is still not easy to decide on the best one. Also, not all of them are really able to help you to dig for a partner. Not paying heed to the fact that the interracial dating sites can seem unserious, you risk having great problems in cases when you single out the unprincipled dating services. Hence, we will tell you in what way to decide on the perfect Internet dating sites.

Hence, it is the undeniable fact it should be said that the Internet dating sites are useful for selecting a partner. Nevertheless, you should better be careful while searching the most sophisticated marriage dating sites since not all of them can be proud of broad-ranging odds and guarantee your safety.

Hunting for a partner with hookup dating sites

Download PDF

At the present day, everything develops. And presently people do what was inadmissible previously. It stands to reason that the serious dating sites are used for deciding on a partner. More than that, the online websites have differing merits. On the other hand, not all the people are planning serious relationships. Eventually, some of them want the adult dating.

Advantages of the online hookup sites

Today, with the hook up websites, people have the right to select a person they like in advance of chatting.

Nowadays, there are broad-ranging hookup dating sites. In such a way, everybody can find the wonderful site for picking love. Nowadays there are such adult hook up sites as EasySex, FreeSnapMilfs, InstantHookups, WellHello and so forth. It is a general knowledge that they all have their odds and weak points. On the other end of the spectrum, it is often complicated to dig for the wonderful hookup sites since they all dispose of manifold opportunities.

One of the most determinative plus points of the online hookup is that everybody has the similar aims for having a deal with these sites. It means that you will get no misunderstandings while communicating with other users.

Hookup websites will be necessary for people who cannot begin communicating in the real life. With the help of the adult hook up sites, it is easy to do to become acquainted with other people.

Whereby to single out the proficient hookup websites

Everybody knows that in these modern days it is hands-down to pick a partner using special sites. However, at times, it is very titanic to single out the sublime online hookup sites. In the real life, it is to emphasize that it depends on various factors. And when you have a desire to get results, we offer you to keep in mind our recipes of hunting for the unbeatable online hookup sites.

Pinpoint your tasks

We would like you to single out your assignments before looking for the hookup sites. It is so because all the adult hookup sites offer you varied possibilities. And at times, it can happen that your and your conversation partner’s goals are very different. To avoid this situation, we think that you have to read about the possibilities of different adult hook up sites and then make a sound decision. What is more, all the online hookup sites offer you the same standard capabilities but in the real life, they differ in numerous functionalities. That is the reason why you also have to glance over this information.

System of protection

Keep in mind the fact that you are digging for the partners for adult dating. On the whole, we are sure that you are going to be on the safety. The low-quality hookup websites will not guarantee you the unbeatable degree of safeness. As it happens, we want you to make sure that the hookup sites you like take the advanced security safeguards.

Audit the opinions of numerous users

This is not a secret that in our days before digging for some goods people skip through the responses about them. And we would like you to do the same with the hookup websites. More than that, it is important insomuch as you converse with people and the adult hookup sites are bound to provide your minimum protection. By such manners, we would like you to glance over the impressions of people in advance of coming to a decision.

As it happens, it is the uncontested fact that it is perfect that in the present day people are in a position to use the Worldwide Web for acquainting with other people. On the contrary, we offer you to pay attention to the fact that picking the sublime hookup sites makes a figure in your communication.

Reports and suggestions

Download PDF
  1. Prof. Sanjay Dhande requested the Chairman, UGC,that the Commission should hold discussion on important policy matters concerning higher education; the Commission members may also propose Agenda items for discussion during the Commission meetings. The Chairman, UGC, clarified that Commission members do propose Agenda Items and the same are taken up for discussion. After discussion it was agreed that in the next meeting the Commission would discuss important policy matters, including developing a pathway and a long term Action Plan (501st Meeting).
  2. Smt. Anjuly Chhib Duggal stated and suggested modification regarding utilization of internal receipts and creation of Reserve Funds in Central Universities, which includes the following: (a) The UGC may draw a list of items of expenditure which can be incurred out of non-Plan non-salary funds; and (b) The UGC may prepare a list of sources from which internal receipts can be generated by the Universities.
  3. The MHRD vide its Order dated 30th July, 2014 constituted a 4 Member UGC Review Committee under the Chairmanship of Dr. Hari Gautam, Former Chairman of UGC. The Chairman, UGC, informed that the Committee had its meeting on 5th and 6th September, 2014 wherein Secretary UGC made a presentation on the role and functions and major initiatives undertaken by the UGC in the recent past.
  4. Consultative Meeting of Vice–Chancellors of Central and State Universities and State Education Secretaries on ‘Reforms in Teacher Education was held on 15th September,2014 in which the morning session was chaired by the Hon’ble HRM, Smt. Smriti Irani. The Chairman, UGC, briefed the Commission of the Agenda discussed in the consultative meeting and its outcome.
  5. The MHRD and the UGC had jointly convened the meeting of the Vice-Chancellors of all the Central Universities on December 4, 2014 at Vigyan Bhawan. The Chairman, UGC, informed that the purpose of this meeting was to make necessary preparations for the Review Meeting to be taken by the Visitor in February, 2015. The Chairman also informed that all the Central Universities have been advised to switch over to Choice Based Credit System from the ensuing academic session.

1.7 Major Decisions during the Year

Download PDF
  1. The Commission ratified and approved the continuation of Colleges under Colleges with Potential for Excellence (CPE)/College of Excellence (CE) which get ‘A’ grade re-accreditation from NAAC within one year after discontinuation under the scheme.
  2. The Commission ratified and approved the University Grants Commission’s Annual Report 2012-2013 (English & Hindi) for placing before the Parliament through MHRD.
  3. The Commission approved the matter of 8 Deemed to be Universities to utilize portion of Internal Receipts of 2013-14 to meet the deficit on Non-Salary expenditure under Non-Plan.
  4. The Commission noted and approved the award of 300 Raman Fellowships for Post-Doctoral research in United States for the year 2014.
  5. The Commission noted and approved the award of grants for the proposals on UGC-UK India Education and Research Initiative UKIERI Thematic Partnership for the year 2013-2014.
  6. The Commission noted and approved the award of Joint Research Projects, 2014 under India New Zealand Education Council (INZEC).
  7. The Commission noted and approved the award of funding under the‘Project-based Personnel Exchange’ Programme.
  8. The Commission noted and approved the award of funding for visit to South Asia Institute, Heidelberg.
  9. The Commission noted and approved the award of funding under “Exchange of Scientists Programme”.
  10. The Commission noted and approved the Agreement on Academic Cooperation between the University Grants Commission (UGC), India, and the Norwegian Centre for International Cooperation in Education (SIU), Norway signed on 14th February, 2014 in New Delhi.
  11. The Commission took note of the number of pending audit paras of the last several years and instructed the UGC Secretariat to promptly send replies to the pending paras.
  12. The Commission decided that Institutions Deemed to be Universities which have been conferred that status for 25 years or more, and have a valid NAAC Grade A accreditation and have also been given ‘A’ Grade by the Tandon Committee may be permitted relaxation to the provisions of clause 5.2 of the UGC Institutions Deemed to be University Regulations, 2010 to the extent that the sponsoring Society/ Trust/ Company of such an Institution can also appoint the President/Trustee/ Promoter of the sponsoring Society/Trust/Company or his/her close relative as its Chancellor provided that such a person is an eminent educationist or a distinguished public figure. The existing Regulations may be amended accordingly.
  13. The Commission approved the Scheme for Creation and Management of ‘Reserve Fund’ through Internal Receipts for Universities and Colleges maintained by the UGC.
  14. The Commission decided that a Committee be constituted consisting of 2 Commission members, representatives from Central/State Universities, and a representative from Ministry of HRD to develop guidelines for norm based funding by the UGC to Universities/colleges by aligning them with the norms under the RUSA.
  15. The Commission considered the directives of the Hon’ble Supreme Court dated 21st January, 2014 on the 44 Category-C Institutions Deemed to be Universities, along with the interlocutory directive dated 5th May, 2014 and resolved as under: Since the time for submission of the Report to the Ministry is 31st July, 2014 the Commission resolved to constitute a Sub-Committee to undertake assessment of the 41 Category ‘C’ Institutions Deemed to be Universities within the stipulated time consisting of the following Members:
  • Prof. Devraj, Vice-Chairman, UGC – Chairman
  • Prof. Sanjay Dhande, Member, UGC – Member
  • Prof. V.S. Chauhan, Member, UGC – Member
  • Mrs. Amita Shamra, Additional Secretary – Member

(As nominee of MHRD)

  1. The Commission resolved , all these Deemed to be Universities shall appear before the Sub-Committee to make a video presentation of their institution and to respond to any queries. The Commission further resolved that after assessing the presentation of each Deemed to be University, the proceedings of the Sub-Committee should be speaking in nature and reasons for arriving at the conclusion on the status of each Institution Deemed to be University should be duly recorded. The Commission also resolved that the proceedings of the Sub-Committee should also be video graphed. Dr. M.M. Ansari and Dr. D.N. Reddy, Members of the Commission, recorded their dissent on the Resolution.
  2. The Commission approved the Report along with the Guidelines for Promotion of Research Integrity and Prevention of Plaglarism in Higher Educational Institutions other than the proposal of providing motivational funds to the institutions. It was decided that a UGC Regulation on the subject needs to be formulated urgently. It was decided to constitute a Committee under the Chairmanship of Prof. Sanjay Dhande to draft appropriate Regulations on the subject.
  3. The Commission decided that the present UGC Regulations on Technical Education be kept on hold till the final outcome of the decision of the Supreme Court.
  4. The Commission resolved to advise the University of Delhi under Section 12(d) of the UGC Act, 1956, to review/reconsider the continuation of the FYUP.
  5. The Commission approved the Guidelines for Special Assistance Programme (SAP) during XII Plan Period (2012-2017).
  6. The Commission approved the XII Plan Guidelines of Dr. S. Radhakrishnan Post Doctoral Fellowship in Humanities & Social Sciences (Including Languages).
  7. The Commission approved the creation of 300 faculty positions under the UGC Faculty Recharge Programme and also decided that a proposal should also be prepared by the UGC for inclusion of social sciences under the Faculty Recharge Programme.
  8. The Commission approved 25 posts under the XII Plan for strengthening NAAC headquarters.
  9. The Commission approved the recommendations of the report of the Committee constituted to review the performance of the Inter-University Centres (IUCs) and decided to constitute the Implementation Monitoring Committee.
  10. The Commission approved the XII plan Guidelines of Special Scholarship Scheme for North Eastern Region with the observation that the parental income be reduced from the proposed 6 lakh per annum to 4.5 lakh per annum. It also decided that the Scheme be launched from academic year 2014-15 onwards.
  11. The Commission approved the recommendations of the 7th Meeting of Standing Committee on Autonomous Colleges held on 03.06.2014 for grant of 33 Fresh and 12 Extension cases of autonomous status to the colleges and consider the approval of the revised guidelines on Autonomous Colleges.
  12. The Commission noted and approved that sanction order in respect of financial assistance to colleges should be utilized within the time period specified under the GFR. Further, the conditions precedent to release of grant should be explicitly mentioned in the sanction order, so that the time within which funds need to be utilized are adhered to by the colleges, and further that the UGC should release funds well in time so that the colleges have sufficient time to utilize the same within the financial year in which grants are released.
  13. The Commission approved the proposal to allow extension of time for completion of projects approved during the XI Plan, and allow institutions to utilize the unspent amount, out of the allocation made during the XI Plan for such projects, during the XII plan period for completion of the projects.
  14. The Commission approved the Notification with the observations that the provisions for Undergraduate programmes should also be extended to Postgraduate programmes and that no animal from any species shall be dissected either by teachers or students for any purpose at these levels.
  15. The Commission approved the XII plan Guidelines for Post Doctoral Fellowship to Scheduled Caste/Scheduled Tribe Candidates.
  16. The Commission approved the amendments in the Guidelines for Centres with Potential for Excellence in Particular Areas (CPEPA) for XII Plan Period (2012-2017).
  17. The Commission approved the XII Plan Guidelines prepared by the Expert Committee for establishment of Hindi Department and promotion of Hindi in Central/State/Deemed to be Universities.
  18. • The Commission considered and approved the matter regarding outsourcing of NET to the Central Board of Secondary Education (CBSE) and also resolved to constitute a Committee to co-ordinate with the CBSE on all matters relating to Pre conduct & Post conduct activities of NET. UGC-NET to continue with the existing pattern of NET , however a subcommittee may be constituted to look into the feasibility of the recommendations of the committee..
  19. The Commission approved the “Guidelines for the Scheme of Granting Special Heritage Status to Universities and Colleges” during XII Plan (2012 – 2017) • The Commission approved the XII Plan Guidelines “Regional Centre for Knowledge Enhancement and Capacity Building” (RCKECB) & “Human Resource Development Centres” (HRDCs)with the observation that “Regional Centre for Knowledge Enhancement and Capacity Building” (RCKECB) should be renamed as ‘Regional Centre for Capacity Building’ (RCCB), and also resolved that the minimum number of participants in the Refresher/Orientation Courses to be 30 (Thirty).
  20. The Commission considered and approved the matter regarding inclusion of “Transgender” as “Third Gender” under various Scholarship/Fellowships schemes of UGC.
  21. The Commission considered and approved the report of the Sub-Committee constituted by the Commission to undertake assessment of the 41Category ‘C’ Institutions Deemed to be Universities and resolved that the report of the Sub-Committee be forwarded by Vice-Chairman, UGC, to the MHRD for further necessary action at their level.
  22. The Commission considered the modifications in the UGC (Promotion and Maintenance of Standards of Academic Collaboration between Indian and Foreign Educational Institutions) Regulations, 2012 and after due deliberations resolved to approve the proposed amendment in the Regulations except a minor modification in clause 5 (c) which will be read as under: “The application, complete in all respects, shall be placed before the Commission for approval. If approved, the Commission will convey its approval within two months”.
  23. The Commission considered and approved the draft of the UGC (Minimum standards and procedure for award of M.Phil/Ph.D. Degrees) Regulations, 2014. • The Commission considered and approved the modifications in UGC’s 12B Rules and application formats.
  24. The Commission considered and approved the XII Plan Guidelines for General Development Assistance (GDA) for Central Universities, Institutions Deemed to be Universities and State Universities.
  25. The Commission considered and resolved to initiate the action on feasibility of formulating New Schemes and/or Expending/Strengthening Existing Schemes in respect of Ideas/points mentioned in PMO’s communication.
  26. The Commission considered and approved the fresh proposals pending for approval of programmes under Open and Distance Learning (ODL) mode.
  27. The Commission considered and approved the Expert Committee’s Report on National Initiative for Fostering Social Responsibility in Higher Education and Guidelines for Establishment of Centre for Fostering Social Responsibility and Community Engagement in Universities during XII Plan (2012 – 2017).
  28. The Commission considered and approved the matter regarding the inclusion of Establishment of Diaspora Chair in Goa University in the Guidelines for the UGC Chairs in Universities during XII Plan (2012-2017).
  29. The Commission considered and approved the XII plan Guidelines of Swami Vivekananda Single Girl Child Scholarship for Research in Social Sciences and that it may also be made on a par with other fellowships awarded for pursing Ph.D. program.
  30. The Commission considered and approved payment of Pension & Family Pension to the UGC Research Scientists directly to the Pensioner’s by the Finance Division, UGC, as done in case of UGC Pensioners/family pensioners cases.
  31. The Commission considered and approvedthe review of the Guidelines for the UGC Chairs in Universities during XII Plan (2012-17) and amendment with regard to remuneration provided to Chair Professors.
  32. The Commission considered and approved the XII Plan Guidelines of the schemes ‘Development of Women Studies in Indian Universities and Colleges’ & ‘Capacity Building of Women Managers in Higher Education’.
  33. • The Commission considered and approved the XII plan Guidelines for Swachh Bharat-Swasth Bharat Scheme of the UGC
  34. The Commission considered and approved the Report of the Expert Committee constituted to assess the proposal of Rashtriya Sanskrit Sansthan (Deemed to be University), New Delhi, to establish off-campus centre at Agartala (Tripura).
  35. The Commission considered the report of the Expert Committee constituted to examine the funds required for ‘Centre for Policy Research in Higher Education’ established by the National University of Educational Planning and Administration (NUEPA) (Deemed to be University), New Delhi, and after due deliberation resolved to approve the proposal with the condition that the progress of the Centre be reviewed on an annual basis and that the Centre will undertake projects, on priority, which would be referred to it by the Commission from time to time.
  36. The Commission considered the observations of the Sub-Committee of the Commission and approved its recommendations with regard to approval of institutions under sections 2(f), 12B and compliance under Section 13 of the UGC Act, 1956.
  37. The Commission after due deliberations approved the guidelines for the Choice Based Credit System. Further, the Commission resolved that before these guidelines are communicated to the Universities for adoption / adaptation they may be vetted by a Committee headed by the Commission Member Shri Patanjali (Patu) G. Keswani.
  38. The Commission considered and approved the inclusion of a Chair in the name of Lakshminath Bezbaroa and Sri Aurobindo in the existing guidelines for UGC Chair in Universities during Twelth Plan.
  39. Based on the concurrence received from majority of the Members, the Commission approved the setting up of IUC-TE at Varanasi with a budgetary requirement of `56 crore (Non-recurring) and 8.32 crore (Recurring) per annum. MoA of the IUC was also approved for the purpose of registration under Societies Registration Act, 1860, or under the relevant Act of the State Government in whose jurisdiction the institution is located.
  40. The Commission considered and approved the draft amendment of “UGC Regulations on curbing the menace of Ragging in Higher Educational Institutions, 3rd Amendment, 2014, and also resolved that since the Raghavan Committee is working for several years it may be requested to look into the issue in its entirety and suggest a way forward.
  41. The Commission considered and approved of the proposal to retain the internal receipts with the Central Universities to cover up the short-fall of non-salary component under Non-Plan Grant till the appropriate allocation is made by MHRD under non-salary components to meet the short-fall under non-salary expenditure (Non-Plan) and also resolved that the internal receipts may also be got audited by the Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG) of India.
  42. The Commission considered and approved the status quo strategy for continuation of recognition to Universities/ Institutions offering programmes through Open and Distance Learning (ODL) mode for the academic session 2015-16.
  43. The Commission decided to give relaxation for releasing the grant under Plan and Non-Plan Scheme of Colleges to all Universities / Colleges to apply for NAAC accreditation upto 31st December, 2015.
  44. The Commission considered and approved the amendment in the clause 7.3.0 of UGC Regulations, 2010 regarding composition of Selection-cum-Search Committee for deemed to be Universities for selection of Vice-Chancellor.
  45. The Commission considered and approved the recommendations of the Standing Committee on “Universities with Potential for Excellence” (UPE) held on 17.11.2014 .
  46. The Commission considered and approved the XII Plan Guidelines of the scheme ‘Epoch Making Social Thinkers of India’.
  47. The Commission considered and approved the collaboration of Bhasha with M. S. University of Baroda for promotion of indigenous languages and resolved that the funding should be given only to M.S University of Baroda.
  48. The Commission considered and approved the Guidelines for Knowledge Upgradation Centers for Skilled Human Action and Learning (KAUSHAL) • The Commission considered and approved the UGC (Revised) Guidelines for Community Colleges.
  49. The Commission considered and approved the guidelines for Curricular Aspects, Assessment Criteria, and Credit System in Skill based Vocational Courses under NSQF.
  50. The Commission considered and approved that extension will be given for a period of one year for the Centres of Nano-Science, Nano-Technology/Bio-Medical, Nano-Technology of University of Mumbai, University of Calcutta and University of Madras respectively which were allocated Special Grant of `100 crore each for celebration of 150 years of their existence.
  51. The Commission noted and approved the amendment to the UGC (Institutions Deemed to be Universities) Regulations,2010, by removing the phrase ‘the senior most Dean or if there is no Dean’ from the clause of 6.2 (3) of the said Regulations. After incorporating the amendments, clause 6.2 (3) of the Regulations would read as under: “In case of the office of the Vice-Chancellor becoming vacant due to death, resignation or otherwise and in case of his/her absence due to illness or any other cause, the Pro-vice-Chancellor, and in his/her absence, the senior most Professor shall perform the duties of the Vice-Chancellor, until a new Vice-Chancellor is appointed, or the existing Vice-Chancellor resumes duties, as the case may be”.
  52. The Commission considered and approved the recommendations of the Standing Committee on Specification of Degrees to be notified as the First Amendment in UGC Notification dated 5th July,2014.
  53. The Commission considered and examined the report of the UGC Expert Committee constituted by the Commission to physically inspect 7 Institutions Deemed to be Universities which had filed Interlocutory Applications before Hon’ble Supreme Court. The Commission observed the number of deficiencies in these Institutions Deemed to be Universities inspected by the Committee. The Commission also noted the observations of Joint Secretary (Higher Education), MHRD. The Commission noted that despite the lapse of several years these institutions have not yet rectified their shortcomings. online pharmacy The Commission after due deliberations resolved that the Reports of the Expert Committee should be examined by the Bureau in order to identify the major deficiencies which shall subsequently be communicated to the MHRD, the seven Institutions Deemed to be Universities and also to the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India. After detailed deliberations, the Commission decided to give them a final opportunity to rectify their deficiencies within a maximum period of one year and submit the compliance report to the UGC within this period, failing which recommendation will be made to the MHRD for denotification of Deemed to be University status.
  54. The Commission considered and approved that the Report of Gurukul Kangri Vishwavidyalaya, Haridwar, be sent to the MHRD and to the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India. • The Commission considered and approved the UGC (Furnishing of Information by Universities) Regulations, 2015.
  55. The Commission considered and approved the Guidelines for ensuring Safety of Students on Excursion/Study Tours.
  56. The Commission considered and approved the Cadre Recruitment Rules of NAAC.
  57. The Commission considered and approved the transfer and release of `20 crores to INFLIBNET (an IUC of UGC) on the recommendations of the Standing Committee constituted for the production of e-Content Courseware on PG Subjects.
  58. The Commission considered and approved and also decided to set up a sub-committee to decide on parameters and guidelines for conferment of Potential for Excellence Status for Deemed to be Universities.
  59. The Commission considered and approved the UGC (Gender Sensitization, Prevention and Prohibition of Sexual Harassment of Women Employees and Students and Redressal of Grievances in Higher Educational Institutions) Regulations,2015.
  60. The Commission considered and approved the guidelines for empanelment of Adjunct Faculty in universities and colleges.
  61. The Commission considered the revised pattern of assistance for release of grant for construction of Women Hostel for Central, State and Deemed Universities during the XII Plan period and decided to release 40% as the first installment followed by 40% as second installment and 20% as the final installment. • The Commission while taking a serious view of the procedure followed in issuing earlier grants and setting up of EMMRC in National Institute of Social Work and Social Sciences (NISWASS) reiterated its earlier decision taken in its meeting held on 11th March,2013 wherein the Commission had resolved: “that the NISWASS be asked to submit the Utilization Certificates of the grants already given to it and that no further grants of any kind be given to NISWASS”. In addition, the Commission also took cognizance of the two Enquiry Committees which were set up to enquire into the irregularities of the Institute, one headed by Shri S. Sathyam, IAS (Retd.) former Secretary, Government of India, set up by the UGC in August, 2012 and the another one headed by Shri M. Gopalakrishnan, IAS (Retd.) set up by the MHRD in November,2013 for examining the irregularities committed by the Institute. Having regard to the above, the Commission decided that the EMMRC in NISWASS be closed down with immediate effect and assets so acquired there be taken over by the Central University of Orissa.

1.6 Joint Cadre Review Committee (JCRC) for Central and Deemed to be Universities

Download PDF

At the behest of the MHRD, the UGC set up a Joint Cadre Review Committee (JCRC) on uniform staffing pattern of the non-teaching staff of Central Universities, the UGC maintained Deemed to be Universities and the Delhi Colleges. The objective of the JCRC is to recommend complete framework of uniform service conditions for the non-teaching staff (Group A, B & C) of these institutions.

The UGC has submitted the report of the JCRC to the MHRD in three phases after consideration and approval of the Commission as under :

  1. Report on Library Services Cadre was submitted vide letter No.F.23-1/2005(JCRC) dated 18th January, 2008.
  2. The report on 15 identified services/cadre structures, i.e. (i) Administrative/ Ministerial Services, (ii) Secretariat Services, (iii) Transport Services, (iv) Guest House/Hostel/Canteen Services, (v) School Teachers, (vi) Security Services, (vii) Sanitation Services, (viii) Official Language Cell, (ix) Photography/Reprography Services, (x) Music Services, (xi) Sports/Games Services, (xii) Horticulture /Garden Services, (xiii) Agricultural/Veterinary Services, (xiv) Religious Services and (xv) Research/Statistical Services, was forwarded vide letter No.F.6- 7/97(JCRC) dated XII June, 2009.
  3. The report on 8 services/cadre structures i.e. (i) Press & Publication Services, (ii) Museum/Archives Services, (iii) Technical /Laboratory Services, (iv) Engineering Services, (v) Workshop services, (vi) University Science Instrumentation Centre, (vii) Health and Medical Services and (viii) Information and Communication Technology (ICT) Services was forwarded to the MHRD vide letter No.F.6-7/97(JCRC) dated 23rd September, 2010.


MHRD vide its letter dated 07.05.2014 approved some of the recommendations of JCRC report which have been communicated to all Central Universities/ UGC maintained Deemed to be Universities, vide UGC letter dated 01.10.2014. On other aspects where no recommendations have been made, concurrence is being sought from MHRD.

Implementation of ACP/MACP schemes in Centrally Funded Institutions

In order to bring uniformity in the implementation of the ACP Scheme in Central Universities, UGC maintained Deemed to be Universities and Delhi Colleges, the UGC has constituted a Standing Committee. It was decided that Universities may implement the ACP Scheme on their own on the basis of the guidelines developed by the Committee after taking into consideration the observations/recommendations of the Standing Committee on the ACP Scheme with regard to individual cases considered by the Committee in the past, in respect of its non-teaching employees. After getting the approval of the MHRD, the UGC conveyed the approval vide its letter dated 9th July, 2010 for the extension of the MACP to Central Universities, UGC maintained Deemed to be Universities and Delhi Colleges to its non-teaching employees.

A number of queries seeking clarification on implementation of ACP/MACP scheme in respect of non-teaching employees of Central Universities/ UGC maintained Deemed to be Universities are being resolved by the JCRC cell on a day to day basis.

Implementation of 6th Central Pay Commission’s Recommendations

Pursuant to the Government of India, Ministry of Human Resource Development vide O.M.No.2-1/2008-U.I(A) dated 6th October, 2008 extending 6th Central Pay Commission recommendation to the Quasi-Government Organizations, Autonomous Organizations and Statutory Bodies set-up and funded/ controlled by Central Government, the UGC sent a proposal for the revision of scale of pay in respect of non-teaching staff of Central Universities, UGC maintained Deemed to be Universities and Delhi Colleges vide letter No.F.20-1/2008(JCRC) dated 3rd December, 2009 for approval. The matter is under consideration of the MHRD. JCRC Section is meanwhile resolving the queries relating to the non-teaching staff in implementation of 6th CPC in Central Universities/ UGC maintained Deemed to be Universities and also actively pursuing the matter with MHRD for approval. The matter regarding grant of Grade Pay of 4800/- in PB-2 to Section Officers/ Private Secretaries of UGC and Central Universities, UGC maintained Deemed to be Universities and Delhi Colleges has been taken up with MHRD for approval.

1.5 Budget and Finances of UGC

Download PDF

The UGC Act empowers the Commission to allocate and disburse funds, out of the fund of the Commission, to universities, colleges and other institutions of higher education in the form of Maintenance (Non-Plan) and Development (Plan) grants through various programmes / schemes of the Commission to maintain and improve standards in the higher education sector. The budget for the year 2014-15 had been as given in the Table 1.5(a)

Table 1.5(a): Budget for the year 2014-2015

S. No.

Budget Head Plan AllocationNon-Plan Allocation
Total:3905.003779.61 5461.265666.94
General 3905.003779.615461.265666.94

Graph 1.5(a) : General Budget for the year 2014-15

Table 1.5(b) : Grants received during 2014-2015 under Plan & Non-Plan (General) Budget Head

S. No. Grant Received From Plan (in carore)Non-Plan (in carore)
Total4879.37 5432.07
1.MHRD, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi. (General) 3480.52 5432.07
2.Ministry of Social & Justice Empowerment New Delhi. 148.85 0.00
3.Ministry of Tribal Affairs New Delhi. 0.00 0.00
4.Ministry of Minority Affairs New Delhi. 0.00 0.00
5.Indira Gandhi National Open University, New Delhi for Distance Education Bureau (DEB) 1250.00 0.00

Graph 1.5(b) : Grants received during 2014-15 under Plan & Non Plan (General) Budget Head

Table 1.5(c) : Grants received during 2014-2015 ( General and unspent Balance 2013-14)

S. No.Budget headPlan Non-Plan
Total:4045.90 5474.43

Graph 1.5(c) : Grant received during 2014-15 (General and unspent Balance 2013-14)

Table 1.5(d): Plan Grants Released to Institutions during 2014-2015

S. No.Type of InstitutionsPlan Grants% of total Plan Grants +
Unspent balance
Total: 4178.46 103.28
1. State Universities
499.04 12.33
2.Colleges of State Universities 231.43 5.72
3.Central Universities 2316.29 57.25
4.Colleges of Central Universities 46.61 1.15
5.Inter-University Centres 127.27 3.15
6.Institutions Deemed to be Universities 106.38
7.Miscellaneous/Non-Univ. &Instts. 155.62 3.85
8.Online Payments through Banks for Scholarships/Fellowships 131.00 3.24
9.Regional Centres 560.41 13.85
10.Estt. 2.31 0.06
11.Distance Education Bureau 2.10 0.05

Graph 1.5(d) : Plan Grant ( in crore ) released to Institutions during 2014-15

Table1.5(e): Non-Plan Grants Released to Institutions during 2014-2015

S. No. Type of Institutions Non-Plan Grants % of total Non-Plan Grants + Unspent
Total: 5536.09101.14
Maintenance to:
a) Central Universities (including UCMS) 3462.93 63.26
b) (i) Colleges of Delhi 1458.14 26.64
(ii) Colleges of BHU 31.490.58
c) Institutions Deemed to be Universities 247.93 4.53
d) Colleges of Central Universities 67.28 1.23
2 .State Universities 140.27 2.56
3 .Inter- University Institutions/Centres 47.88 0.87
4.State Colleges 2.19 0.04
5.Administrative Charges (Head Office) 69.99 1.28
6.Administrative Charges (Regional Offices) 7.99 0.15

Graph 1.5(e) : Non-Plan Grant Released to Institutions during 2014-15

Table 1.5(f) : Plan Grants Released –Summary (2014-2015)

Sector - 1 Sector - 2 Sector - 3 Sector - 4 Sector - 9 Total
(Sec. 1 to 4 & 9)
Grand Total 212650.00 5445.04 197465.85 2000.00 210.00 417770.89
Central Univerisities 209846.89 0.00 21782.50 0.00 0.00 231629.39
Deemed to be Universities0.00 5445.04 5158.67 0.00 0.00 10603.71
State Universities 0.00 0.00 49904.11 0.00 0.00 49904.11
Inter Unversity Centres 0.00 0.00 10726.92 2000.00 0.00 12726.92
Non-Universities Instts. 0.00 0.00 15561.63 0.00 0.00 15561.63
Online Payment through Banks for
0.00 0.00 13100.07 0.00 0.00 13100.07
Distance Education Bureau 210.00 210.00
Total Universities 209846.89 5445.04 116233.90 2000.00 210.00 333735.83
Central Univerisities 2803.11 0.00 1857.64 0.00 0.00 4660.75
Deemed to be Univs. 0.00 0.00 33.530.00 0.00 33.53
State Universities 0.00 0.00 23142.91 0.00 0.00 23142.91
Non-Universities Instts. 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total Colleges 2803.110.00 25034.08 0.00 0.00 27837.19
Total Univ. + Colleges 212650.005445.04 141267.98 2000.00 210.00 361573.02
Regional Centers 0.00 56041.60 56041.60
156.27 156.27

Sector 1: Central Universities, Sector 2: Deemed Universities, Sector 3: (Central / State/Deemed) , Sector 4 : miscellaneous , Sector 9 : DEB

Graph 1.5(f ) : Sector-wise Plan Grant Released during 2014-15

Graph 1.5(f) :Sector-wise Plan Grant Released during 2014-15 ( in Lakhs)

Table 1.5(g) : Non-Plan Grants Released–Summary (2014-15)

Particulars Administrative

Inter Univ.
Block Grants
for specific

Block Grants
to Deemed
Grants to Delhi
to BHU
Grants to
(Section 1
to 9)
Grand Total : 7798.00 1739.004387.22 13183.97 24792.94 145814.00 3148.66 352745.40 553609.19
Central Univ.275.82346017.22 346293.04
Deemed Univ24792.9424792.94
Inter Univ.Centers401.004387.224788.22
State Univ843.2013183.9714027.17
Sub Total :0.001520.024387.2213183.9724792.940.000.00346017.22 389901.37
Delhi Colleges145814.00145814.00
BHU Colleges3148.663148.66
Central Univ.6728.186728.18
State Colleges218.98218.98
Sub Total :0.00218.980.000.000.00145814.003148.666728.18155909.82
Total : Univ. + Colloges0.001739.004387.2213183.9724792.94145814.003148.66352745.40 545811.19
Charges (Head

6998.58 6998.58
Charges (Regional
799.42 7799.42 7

Graph 1.5(g ) : Head-wise Non-Plan Grant Released during 2014-15

1.5(h):State-wise Grants (Non-Plan &Plan (General) )(In lakhs) Released to Universities / Colleges / Others* during 2014-15

State / U.T
Non-Plan#Plan## Plan+Non-Plan
Total385113.16 155909.82 4788.22 545811.20 292348.14 27837.20 12726.92 332912.26 677461.30 183747.02 17515.14 878723.46
Universities Colleges OthersTotal Universities Colleges Others Total Universities Colleges Others Total
1.Andhra Pradesh 1944.19 1944.193713.43 823.62 4537.055657.62 823.62 0.006481.24
2.Arunachal Pradesh 3092.693092.69948.0016.40964.40 4040.69 16.40 0.00 4057.09
3.Assam 7872.05 7872.05 5735.45 1279.42 7014.87 13607.50 1279.420.00 14886.92
4.Bihar 0.00 7837.30 437.75 8275.05 7837.30 437.75 0.00 8275.05
5.Chattisgarh 1716.56 1716.56 3119.83 169.97 3289.80 4836.39169.97 0.00 5006.36
6. Delhi 86856.32 152542.18 2203.05 241601.55 24529.92 3579.68 820.99 28930.59 111386.24 156121.86 3024.04 270532.14
7. Goa0.00 179.58 22.64 202.22 22.64 179.580.00 202.22
8.Gujarat 3005.59 281.003286.59 6787.15792.35 7518.85 15098.35 9792.74 792.35 7799.8518384.94
9.Haryana 0.00 7262.27768.97 8031.24 7262.27 768.970.008031.24
10.Himachal Pradesh 0.001578.05 83.87 1661.92 1578.05 83.870.00 1661.92
11.Jammu & Kashmir 121.00121.0024426.55 11.52 24438.07 24547.55 11.52 0.00 24559.07
12. Jharkhand 0.002850.09 233.633083.72 2850.09 233.63 0.00 3083.72
13.Karnataka 97.00 329.17 426.17 14866.78 1764.81 16631.59 14963.78 1764.81329.17 17057.76
14.Kerala36.8436.8418985.89 2522.89 21508.7819022.732522.89 0.00 21545.62
15.Madhya Pradesh 8607.15921.009528.1523610.11 382.552868.5826861.2432217.26382.55 3789.5836389.39
16.Maharashtra 6936.101054.007990.105926.41 5569.40 1495.1812990.9912862.515569.402549.1820981.09
17.Manipur 6967.096967.093031.32 653.08 3684.409998.41 653.080.00 10651.49
18.Meghalaya 14650.0714650.072152.33 18.96 2171.2916802.40 18.96 0.0016821.36
19. Mizoram 4506.384506.384651.93 4.614656.549158.31 4.610.00 9162.92
20.Nagaland 6070.16 6070.162196.91106.16 2303.07 8267.07106.160.00 8373.23
21.Orissa 0.008253.07271.63
8524.70 8253.07 271.630.008524.70
22. Punjab 0.0017464.40 2262.8719727.2717464.40 2262.87 0.00 19727.27
23.Rajasthan 67.5067.50 11493.95371.2611865.2111561.45371.26 0.0011932.71
24. Sikkim 0.006607.046607.04 6607.040.000.006607.04
25.Tamil Nadu 7643.687643.6816060.49 2385.73 18446.2223704.172385.73 0.00 26089.90
26.Telagana 24150.79 24150.7915623.04 522.7716145.81 39773.83522.770.00 40296.60
27.Tripura 2819.80 2819.80 2648.62 2648.62 5468.42 0.00 0.00 5468.42
28.Uttar Pradesh 149105.453148.66152254.1133479.811707.5535187.36 182585.26 4856.210.00 187441.47
29.Uttarakhand 9677.439677.433430.373430.37 13107.80 0.00 0.0013107.80
30. West Bengal 18557.49 218.98 18776.47 9591.71 1005.7723.32 10620.80 28149.20 1224.75 23.3229397.27
31.Chandigarh 13183.9713183.970.000.00 13183.97 0.0013183.97
32.Puducherry7427.867427.86 3306.34 67.34 3373.68 10734.20 67.340.00 10801.54

* Others – Inter University Centres

Note :# (i) Non-Plan Grants excludes administrative Charges ( Head office & Regional Ofice)

## (ii)Plan Grants excludes grants released to Misc/Non-Univ. Centres, On line payment through Banks for Scholarships / Fellowships, Regional Centres, Estt., DEB

Graph 1.5(h)(i) : State-wise Plan## Grant ( in Lakhs) released to Universities / Colleges/Others during 2014-15

Graph 1.5(h)(ii) :State-wise Non-Plan# Grant ( in Lakhs) released to Universities / Colleges /Others during 2014-15

Graph 1.5(h) : State-wise Non-Plan+ Plan Grant Released to Universities / Colleges /others during 2014-15

1.4 Publications

Download PDF

The Publication Bureau has been bringing out various publications such as the UGC Annual Report, Guidelines for various schemes/ programmes being implemented in the higher education sector, UGC enactments, Reports on UGC- Conferences, Committee Reports and Statistical Reports.. It also gets various stationery items printed for use by various UGC officials viz; visiting cards, envelops, UGC TA/DA forms, certificates of UGC Hindi Divas and the Annual Confidential Report (ACR) proforma. Apart from regular printing work, the Publication Bureau has brought out the following publications:-

S. No.Printed Documents
1.UGC Act with Rules & Regulations (Reprinting)
2. SAKSHAM Measures for Ensuing the Safety of Women and Programmes for Gender Sensitization on Campuses (Book)
3. University Development in India-Directory of Teaching Departments in Universities/PG/Centres/Constitutent Colleges. Faculty
wise for 2011-12
4.XII Plan Guidelines for Skill Development based Vocational Courses under National Skill Qualifications Framework (NSQF) 2012-

The year wise details of expenditure incurred towards printing of Publications/other items during XIIth Plan period are as under:

YearExpenditure (in Lakhs)

Graph 1.4: Yearwise Expenditure towards Printing of Publications


Action taken by the UGC during 2014-15

Download PDF

In addition to 21 fake Universities, there are two more institutes which are not recognized by the UGC under Section 2(f) of the UGC Act, 1956. Therefore, these two institutes are not empowered to confer degrees. The names of these two institutes are as below:-

A. Bhartiya Shiksha Parishad, Lucknow, UP. In the year 2011 the UGC placed the name of BSP in the footnote of the list of fake universities.

B. Indian Institute of Planning and Management (IIPM).

The Delhi High Court passed final judgment against IIPM on 26/09/2014 in WP(C) No. 5937/2010 titled B. Mahesh Vs. GOI & others. The court also restrained IIPM and its management with immediate effect from using the words MBA, BBA, Management Courses, Management School, Business School or B-School in relation to the courses offered by IIPM. The Court disposed off the case on 31/10/2014. On the basis of the final judgement of Delhi High Court passed against IIPM, the UGC filed FIR against IIPM.

(i) Cell against “Sexual Harassment of Women at Work Place”

To look into the grievances of women employees at work place, the Cell against “Sexual Harassment of Women at Work Place” is headed by a Joint Secretary, UGC. In the period of report there were no instances of any complaint.

(j) Anti-Ragging Cell

In pursuance to the Judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India dated 8.5.2009 in Civil Appeal No. 887/2009), the University Grants Commission has framed “UGC Regulations on curbing the menace of ragging in higher educational institutions, 2009” notified on 17th June, 2009 which are in force. The UGC has informed all Universities that the Regulations are mandatory.

The Commission has made it mandatory for all institutions to incorporate in their prospectus the directions of the Government regarding prohibition and consequences of ragging. The Commission has included a specific condition in the Sanction Letter in respect of any financial assistance or grants-in-aid to any institution under any of the general or special schemes of the Commission that the institution has complied with the anti-ragging measures. The UGC reminds all Universities every year before the start of the academic session through public notices, website and letters to Universities to ensure strict compliance of anti-ragging measures.The UGC has issued a circular to all universities dated 04.08.2014 for constitution of various Committees and compliance of UGC Regulations on curbing the menace of Ragging in Higher Educational Institutions, 2009 and also sent a letter to the Vice-Chancellors dated 28.04.2014 & 04.08.2014 regarding menace of ragging in higher education and requested to display hoardings, distribute pamphlets etc. The UGC has also published a public notice on 18.07.2014 on curbing the menace of Ragging in Higher Educational Institutions in the leading newspapers. All the above circulars & public notice have been displayed on the UGC website i.e.

A video film on anti-ragging developed by Consortium for Educational Communications (CEC) has been uploaded on the UGC website and all universities/institutions which come under the purview of UGC have been asked to give wide publicity amongst students, staff, other stakeholders and colleges under their jurisdiction. As per the second amendment to the UGC Anti-ragging Regulations published on 29.03.2014 in the Gazette of India, the UGC has made it mandatory for all students/parents to submit filled anti-ragging related online undertaking to the institutions at the time of admission and every academic year.

A nationwide toll free anti-ragging helpline 1800-180-5522 has been established which can be accessed by students in distress owing to ragging related incidents. The helpline has been established with call centre facilities in 12 languages, viz. English, Hindi and regional languages (Tamil, Telugu, Malayalam, Kannada, Punjabi, Marathi, Oriya, Assamese, Gujarati and Bengali), for helping victims of ragging besides facilitating effective action in respect of such incidents. The Helpline directly receives complaints from the complainant/victim of ragging. The same is forwarded by the help-line to the respective institutions and the local administration (SHO & SP) for taking necessary corrective action. The Anti-Ragging Cell in the UGC office coordinates the various anti-ragging measures. All complaints regarding alleged ragging incidents received in the Cell are being promptly attended to and action taken report is sought from the institutions concerned. In cases of delayed response, repeated reminders are made and when no action taken is reported, punitive action is being initiated.

During 2014-15, the UGC received 211 alleged ragging complaints. The UGC has brought these complaints to the notice of respective institutions and vigorously followed up with them through reminders and show-cause notices to take urgent and immediate action in this regard. 181 complaints were closed during 2014-15 at the level of the UGC. In the remaining 30 cases action taken report is awaited and in case no response is received, relevant punitive action shall be initiated as per the UGC Regulations on curbing the menace of Ragging, 2009.

YearTotal number of
complaints received in
the year 2014-15
No. of cases in which
action taken was
reported by institutions
1st April, 2014 to
31st March, 2015
21118130In case no report is received relevant
punitive action shall be initiated as per
UGC Regulations.

The Hon’ble Supreme Court vide Civil Appeal No. 887 of 2009 in its judgment dated 8.5.2009 had constituted a Committee comprising of psychiatrists/mental health specialists, etc. to ascertain the psychological impact of ragging on students and recommend urgent and mandatory mental health measures to be implemented in Schools, Colleges and all educational and vocational institutions, so as to avoid the occurrence of ragging.

The UGC has approved a proposal of the Committee constituted by Hon’ble Supreme Court to conduct Psycho Social Study of Ragging in selected educational institutions in India. An amount of 49.12 Lakh has been approved and 24,56,000/- & 10,00,000/- has been released for this purpose on 5.10.2012 & 28.03.2014. The report of the Committee was to be submitted by 31.07.2015. The UGC has given extension to Monitoring Agency i.e. Aman Satya Kachroo Trust, Gurgaon from 2nd January, 2015 to 1st July, 2015.

The 4th meeting of the Inter Council Committee & Coordination Group was held on 17.12.2014. It was decided in the meeting to request the Universities/Institutions to strictly follow the Anti Ragging Regulations made by the UGC and other Regulatory authorities and emphasized the use of Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) in other Regulatory Bodies for quick disposal of the complaints.

The following are the Committees constituted by the Chairman UGC:

i. Committee for Selection of New Anti Ragging Helpline.

ii. Committee for selection of Monitoring Agency

The Commission in its meeting held on 22.12.2014 has approved the draft 3rd Amendment in the UGC Regulations on curbing the menace of ragging in higher educational institutions regarding inclusion of the cases of Ethnic & Racial discrimination in the institutions of higher education and sent to Dr. R. K. Raghvan Committee for their suggestion.

Special Cells Functioning in the UGC

Download PDF

(a) Right to Information Act (RIA) Cell

The University Grants Commission is an autonomous body under MHRD and provides information to the applicants under Right to Information Act, 2005. The RIA cell receives the applications/appeals and forwards them to different Central Public Information Officers (CPIOs)/ Appellate Authorities who have the relevant information.

• There are 24 Appellate Authorities and 39 CPIOs in the office of the UGC, including the main office, branch offices and Regional offices.

• All the Bureau Heads in the UGC are designated as Appellate Authorities under RTI and the Deputy Secretaries/ Under Secretaries/Education Officers in the bureau under them are designated as Central Public Information Officers.

• The RTI applications / appeals from the applicants and notices/ decisions from Central Information Commission, etc. are centrally received in the name of Central Public Information Officer (CPIO) at the main office and forwarded to the CPIOs concerned who have the requisite information.

• A copy of the RTI application/appeal/notice/decision is retained in the RIA cell for record.

• The data of quarterly/ annual report of number of RTI applications/ appeals/fee, etc. is prepared by RIA Cell and uploaded on the CIC portal and on UGC website.

• The RTI applications/appeals received at Regional Offices are being dealt directly by the respective Central Public Information Officers/ Appellate Authorities.

• The record of the RTI fee collected from the applicants is also maintained by the RIA Cell.

• The list of Central Public Information Officers/ Appellate Authorities is placed on the UGC website

During the year 2014-15, UGC received and disposed of 16,648 RTI applications and 1,199 Appeals. The RTI fee collected was 95,850 /-and the additional fee 46,259/- during the year 2014-15.

(b) Pay Scale Cell

The Pay Scale Cell, set up in 1984, is entrusted with the responsibility of coordinating the work of Pay Review Committees set up from time to time. It interacts with the National Level Organizations of teachers and also the MHRD in matters relating to Pay Scales, Career Advancement Scheme (CAS) advance increments for M.Phil/ Ph.D. degree holders, Refresher Courses/Orientation Courses, Counting of Past Service & other Misc. queries in Universities and Colleges. The Pay Scale Section also deals with policy matters relating to Minimum qualifications, Age of Superannuation & other service conditions of teachers and other academic staff in Universities and Colleges.

Evaluation/Assessment Reports/Papers for promotion from Reader to Professor under Career Advancement Scheme for the period 2014-15.

The UGC has been monitoring the Selection Process for promotion from Reader to the post of Professor under CAS in all recognized Universities. During the reporting year i.e. 2014-15, no UGC observer was appointed to oversee the Selection Process for promotion from the post of Reader to the post of Professor under CAS. However, the reports/ papers/publications/evaluation – assessment reports in respect of the candidates concerned who were interviewed by the Selection Committee were sent by the Universities/Colleges to the Commission and the same are assessed by the Bureau. Further, the UGC has framed UGC (Minimum Qualifications for Appointment of Teachers and Other Academic Staff in Universities and Colleges and Measures for the Maintenance of Standards in Higher Education) Regulations, 2010 which came into effect from 30.06.2010. There is no provision for nomination of UGC observer as per these Regulations, 2010.

(c) SC/ST/OBC Cell

The SC/ST/OBC Cell of UGC monitors the effective implementation of the Reservation Policy for SC, ST& OBC candidates in admissions, and teaching and non-teaching posts in universities and colleges. The UGC constituted a Standing Committee to oversee the effective implementation of the reservation policy in universities and colleges. The Committee consists of academic experts, former Vice-Chancellors and distinguished persons in the field of higher education. The Standing Committee and Sub-Standing Committee meet from time to time and monitor the status of reservations and the backlog in vacancies in universities and colleges.

As per the directions of the Government of India, the UGC has been striving for the implementation of reservation policy for other backward classes (OBCs) in teaching, non-teaching and in admissions. Instructions have been issued to implement 27% reservation for OBCs in all the grant-in-aid institutions funded by the Central Government, except minority Intuitions under Article 3(1) of the Constitution of India. A Standing Committee has also been constituted by the UGC for the welfare of Other Backward Classes to assess and monitor the implementation of the reservation policy for OBCs in appointments and admissions in universities, colleges and other institutions of higher education.

The cell collects information from Central, State and Deemed universities under section 12B of the UGC Act on backlog vacancies and the action taken by the universities to fill up these posts. The information collected is forwarded to the Ministry of Human Resource Development.

(d) Minorities Cell

The Minorities Cell of the UGC deals with the issues relating to minorities, like giving the status of Deemed Universities to Minorities Institutions, providing affiliation to Minorities Institutions with the Universities and dealing with other minorities – related issues.

The Standing Committee for Welfare of Minorities regularly monitors and reviews the ongoing schemes for welfare of Minorities. The Standing Committee holds its meeting once or twice in a year, as per the direction of the Government of India, and the meeting of the Sub-Committee for the Welfare of Minorities constituted is held from time to time. The Committee recommended the inclusion of Sub-Component to enhance the number of schemes for welfare of Minorities.

(e) Vigilance Cell

The University Grants Commission has set up a Vigilance Cell in accordance with the instructions of the Government of India to keep a close watch on official work so that it does not indulge in acts of corruption. The Cell, generally, is headed by an officer of Joint Secretary rank or above on the recommendation of the Chairman, UGC, which is duly vetted by the Central Vigilance Commission. The Chief Vigilance Officer (CVO) is mainly responsible for the prevention and detection of corruption cases in the UGC, Universities / Colleges and to take legal action wherever necessary. The CVO is to further ensure the following:

o maintenance of proper surveillance on officers of doubtful integrity;

o prompt observance of Conduct Rules relating to integrity covering (i) statement of assets and acquisitions (ii) gifts (iii) relatives employed in private firms or doing private business (iv) benami transactions;

o locating sensitive spots, regular and surprise inspections of such spots and proper scrutiny of personnel who are posted in sensitive posts;

o introduction of preventive measures for bringing transparency and simplicity in the process of allocation and disbursement of grants to universities and colleges

The UGC observed the Vigilance awareness week from 27th October, 2014 to 1st November, 2014 by administering the pledge, displaying banners and posters and distributing pamphlets, etc. during the period under report.

During 2014-15, the Vigilance Cell received complaints from CVC (15), MHRD (11), CBI (29) and various Universities / Colleges and other agencies(255). The complaints received against Universities and Colleges have been forwarded to the bureau concerned of the UGC for taking necessary action. The Complaints of sensitive nature had been placed before the Standing Committee on Vigilance (SCV) appointed by Chairman, UGC. The Cell initiates action according to the recommendations of SCV/Vigilance Enquiry Committee.

On the recommendation of SCV, Enquiry Committees were constituted in some cases by the Chairman, UGC to look into the complaints regarding misuse of UGC funds. On the basis of the findings of Enquiry Committee and recommendation of SCV the release of further UGC grant to three colleges were stopped till further orders during the year under report.

As on 31.12.2014 there are 40 complaints pending for disposal. Out of 40 cases 4 cases are against UGC employees and rest of them are against University / Colleges employees.

(f) Legal Cell

The Legal Cell was established in 1989 in the UGC main Office. The Legal Cell deals with Court Cases in Supreme Court of Court of India, various High Courts, District Courts, Tribunals/ Forums / Commissions, etc.

Presently,most of the running cases are regarding pay scales, qualifications, age of superannuation,selection of teaching and non-teaching staff in the Universities and Colleges, admission in Professional Courses, UGC NET examination and Establishment of different Institutions / Fake Institutions, etc. Some cases are regarding Administrative matters of UGC staff also.

A panel of Advocates in different courts including Supreme Court of India has been prepared with the approval of Competent Authority and assigned the task of defending the cases on behalf of UGC.

Detailed below are the year wise number of cases involved and the expenditure incurred on them (2012-13 to 2014-15).

YearNo. of cases receivedExp. Incurred on the Bills of Advocates. (In lakhs.)

Graph 1.4(f) :Year-wise number of cases received and Expenditure incurred (In Lakh)


(g) Desk: Parliament Matters

Desk: Parliament matters in the UGC office coordinates the replies to Parliament Questions related to higher education received from various Ministries of the Govt. of India, particularly the Ministry of Human Resource Development.

The number of parliament questions received & replied during budget / monsoon / winter Sessions of Lok Sabha / Rajya Sabha during 2014-2015 is given below:

YearTotal number of Parliament Questions
Out of Total, Number of Starred
Number of Assurances

2014-15 (1st April 2014 to 31st March 2015)

Session DateLok Sabha Parliament
Questions received
Rajya Sabha Parliament
Questions received
Admitted /
Admitted /
StarredAdmitted /
7th July 2014 to 14th August 2014150141221427228300
24th November 2014 to 23rd December
23rd February 2015 to 20th March

(h) Cell against Malpractices

The Cell against Malpractices, established on 30 May, 1996, deals with matters relating to the existence/ functioning of fake or unrecognized universities/ institutions in the country which are awarding degrees in contravention of the UGC Act, 1956. These are not established institutions under a State Act or a Central Act or a Provincial Act or an Institution specially empowered to confer or grant degrees. Therefore, the fake Universities/ Institutions are not recognized under Section 2(f) of the UGC Act, 1956.

  1. The basic objective of the Cell is to collect information through print media and other sources and bring it to the notice of the commission and to identify fake universities on the basis of complaints received from public/ students/parents and include the name of fake universities in the list of fake universities maintained by the UGC.
  2. For awareness of public/students the UGC every year publishes Public Notice on fake universities as well as unrecognized status of IIPM in the leading daily newspapers in Hindi & English language and warn them not to seek admission in such fake universities. These are also posted on the UGC website:
  3. The UGC requests the Chief Secretaries/Education Secretaries/Principal Secretaries of all States/U.T for taking action against fake universities functioning in their jurisdiction.

Presently, there are 21 fake Universities/Institutions on the list of fake Universities maintained by the UGC. The Statewise list of 21 Fake Universities is available at UGC website.